The IEBCOMPR utility compares two z/OS data sets at the logical-record level. A familiar step starts with //COMPARE EXEC PGM=IEBCOMPR, assigns the inputs to SYSUT1 and SYSUT2, and sends the comparison report to SYSPRINT.
What IEBCOMPR compares
IEBCOMPR can compare two sequential data sets, two partitioned data sets (PDS), or two partitioned data sets extended (PDSE). It supports fixed, variable, and undefined record formats, whether blocked or unblocked. The two inputs must have the same logical record length. Their block sizes can differ.
A sequential pair is equal when both inputs contain the same number of records and each corresponding record is equal. If keyed records are involved, their keys must also agree. For a PDS or PDSE pair, corresponding members must have the same records, keys, note-list positions, and directory user data.
For the wider utility family, see the JCL utility overview. IEBCOMPR is for comparison; IEBCOPY copies and maintains partitioned data sets, while IEBPTPCH prints or punches sequential and partitioned data.
IEBCOMPR DD statements
| Statement | Purpose | Important point |
|---|---|---|
EXEC PGM=IEBCOMPR | Runs the comparison program. | Give the step a clear name so later JCL can test its condition code. |
SYSPRINT | Receives messages and the difference report. | Required. Review it even when automation tests the step result. |
SYSUT1 | Defines the first input data set. | Input can also be passed from an earlier step. |
SYSUT2 | Defines the second input data set. | Its LRECL must match SYSUT1; BLKSIZE may differ. |
SYSIN | Supplies IEBCOMPR control statements. | Use DD DUMMY for a basic sequential comparison. |
The JCL EXEC statement selects the program, and the JCL DD statement connects the program to each data set.
Sequential data set comparison JCL
This example compares a source data set with its backup. No user exit, label processing, or organization override is required, so SYSIN DD DUMMY is sufficient.
IEBCOMPR treats sequential organization as the default. If records differ, the report identifies the record and block numbers, the associated DD names, and the unequal record contents. After ten successive unequal comparisons, IEBCOMPR stops the step unless a user exit takes control.
PDS or PDSE comparison JCL
For partitioned organization, the COMPARE statement must be the first control statement and TYPORG=PO identifies PDS or PDSE input.
The alternative TYPORG=PS explicitly selects sequential organization. A COMPARE statement is also required when IEBCOMPR exit routines or label processing are requested.
Compare a data set after a copy step
A verification flow should run the comparison only if the copy completed successfully. The following example copies a sequential data set and then compares source with target. It intentionally keeps allocation details short; production jobs should follow local SMS, retention, and catalog standards.
This pattern separates the copy result from the comparison result. A scheduler or later step can react to the named VERIFY step, while SYSPRINT retains the detailed diagnostic report.
Record format and allocation checks
- LRECL: SYSUT1 and SYSUT2 must have the same logical record length or IEBCOMPR considers them unequal.
- BLKSIZE: block sizes may differ. For fixed blocked records, each block size must be a multiple of LRECL and cannot exceed 32,760 bytes.
- Organization: compare sequential with sequential or partitioned with partitioned; select partitioned processing with
TYPORG=PO. - VSAM: IEBCOMPR is part of the non-VSAM data set utility group and is not a VSAM comparison tool.
- Program objects: use a suitable program-object or library tool rather than IEBCOMPR to validate load modules.
IEBCOMPR versus SuperC
| Requirement | IEBCOMPR | SuperC |
|---|---|---|
| IBM direction for new comparisons | Retained mainly for compatibility with existing jobs. | IBM's recommended choice instead of IEBCOMPR. |
| Operation | Batch utility called with PGM=IEBCOMPR. | Foreground through ISPF option 3.12 or batch with PGM=ISRSUPC. |
| Comparison choices | Logical-record comparison with a traditional difference listing. | File, line, word, and byte comparison with reporting options such as DELTA, CHNG, LONG, and OVSUM. |
| Best reason to keep it | An established, tested job requires the original behavior. | A new or revised process needs clearer reports and more comparison control. |
Migration is not only a program-name substitution. Test the SuperC options, sequence-column handling, report format, return-code expectations, and downstream automation before replacing an established IEBCOMPR step.
Troubleshooting an IEBCOMPR step
- If the step reports immediate inequality, compare the two LRECL values and confirm both DD statements identify the intended generation or copy.
- If a PDS or PDSE job is treated incorrectly, confirm that
COMPARE TYPORG=POis the first SYSIN control statement. - If output is truncated or hard to read, check the SYSPRINT allocation and spool destination before changing the comparison logic.
- If the step stops after repeated differences, remember the ten-successive-mismatch rule and inspect the earliest reported records.
- If the target is VSAM or a program library, choose a tool designed for that data type.
For readers learning the surrounding syntax, the JCL tutorial explains job, EXEC, and DD structure before utility-specific control statements are added.
Official IBM references
- IEBCOMPR: Compare data sets
- IEBCOMPR job control statements
- IEBCOMPR COMPARE statement
- IEBCOMPR examples
- SuperC utility option 3.12
- SuperC reference
Frequently asked questions
What does the IEBCOMPR utility compare?
IEBCOMPR compares two sequential data sets, two partitioned data sets, or two PDSEs at the logical-record level. It is often retained in jobs that verify a backup or copy.
Is SYSIN required for IEBCOMPR?
Yes. Code SYSIN DD DUMMY for a basic sequential comparison without user routines. Supply a COMPARE statement for a PDS or PDSE comparison and when exits or labels are used.
Can IEBCOMPR compare VSAM data sets or load modules?
No. The z/OS data set utilities described for IEBCOMPR do not support VSAM, and IBM says not to use IEBCOMPR to compare load modules.
Should a new job use IEBCOMPR or SuperC?
IBM recommends SuperC instead of IEBCOMPR for new comparison work. SuperC offers foreground and batch operation plus more useful reporting and comparison choices.
